Monday, November 10, 2014

Who Cheated Him Out of An Education?!

At what age do we become responsible adults? Is it 18, 21, or is it when we decide that we have to be. One thing's for sure, taking responsibility doesn't always feel good. In fact, it can be down right painful. Especially when it means admitting that you are the architect of your own failure. For this reason, some of us take whatever opportunity that we can to blame somebody else. You might win and you may even get away with it. But at the end of the day, YOU KNOW! 

A former UNC-Chapel Hill football player is suing the famed university. 

It comes after the 18-year academic scandal that kept athletes eligible to play sports by taking classes that never met or even existed

Mike McAdoo lost his eligibility in 2011.

McAdoo's lawsuit says that he was guaranteed a good education while being recruited by football coaches, but was ultimately guided to consider three options, one of which was African-American Studies, the curriculum that formed the basis for the long-running academic scandal.

"We're not out to vilify UNC. We're trying to restore the student-athlete principle that UNC's really been for so long in the forefront of," said Jeremi Duru, a Washington, D.C., attorney representing McAdoo who also teaches law at American University.

It's a class-action lawsuit filed by McAdoo that other students could easily join.

Rick White, UNC Associate Vice Chancellor for Communications and Public Affairs, said the school became aware of the lawsuit last Friday and will reserve comment until it has reviewed the claims.

McAdoo, who played football at UNC from 2008 through 2010, was ruled permanently ineligible in 2011 for academic violations connected to a tutor providing improper assistance on a research paper for a class in the formerly named African and Afro-American Studies department.

But the bottom line is, by agreeing to go along with the deception, Macadoo ultimately cheated himself out of an education.

The lawsuit comes weeks after a report detailing the academic and athletic scandal at UNC, which revealed that more than 3,100 athletes and everyday students took no-show classes in the formerly named African and Afro-American Studies department for nearly two decades ending in 2011.

The report by former U.S. Justice Department official Kenneth Wainstein said those classes resulted in artificially high grades while faculty and university administrators either missed red flags or looked the other way. The report also said almost half the students enrolled in the bogus classes were athletes, more than 10 times their proportion in the overall student population. Athletics staffers steered players to the classes when they struggled to meet the grades required to continue competing.

In the lawsuit, McAdoo said UNC coaches and other representatives "enticed these football student-athletes to sign the agreements with promises of a legitimate UNC education . . ."

"Instead, UNC systematically funneled its football student-athletes into a 'shadow curriculum' of bogus courses which never met and which were designed for the sole purpose of providing enrollees high grades," the lawsuit said. It also said the curriculum featured hundreds of courses which never met and never involved a professor and that hundreds of football student-athletes were steered to the courses.

Also, the lawsuit says UNC has reaped "substantial profits" from football players, but has not provided them with an education in return, thus breaching its contract with McAdoo and other student-athletes in violation of North Carolina law. The lawsuit also accuses the school of fraud by promising "a legitimate education" to McAdoo and others enrolled at UNC as football student-athletes.

Jay Smith, colleague and co-author with former UNC advisor Mary Willingham, the whistleblower who claimed some student athletes were functionally illiterate, said he thinks McAdoo has a case.

"The moral case that he's making is a very strong one -- that he was not taken care of educationally, that he was steered into courses that did not exist. Not only did they not offer the kind of intellectual enrichment you would hope to find at a great university, but they did not exist," said Smith. "He took a bunch of courses like that because he was steered into them and that was irresponsible of the university."

I've said it before and I've said it again. There is something to be said for personal responsibility. This young man and other student athletes are old enough to know the difference between write and wrong. So when they talk about being enticed, it gives the impression of ignorance, and stupidity.


No comments:

Post a Comment